| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sudtyro
Hooked
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 49
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 5:10 pm Post subject: ALS Notation Question |
 |
|
| Code: |
. . . | . . . | . . .
. A69 . | . . . | . B36 .
A379 A79 . | . . . | . . .
------------+-----------+----------
|
With an ALS-XZ rule applied to sets A and B above, then X=6 (restricted common), and Z=3, so r2c13 <> 3. What is the proper Eureka notation for the rows and columns in set A, which is a case where the ALS cells don’t all lie in the same row or column? Do you simply use r23c12, or something else, since there might be other candidates in r2c1? And if the former, then is the proper AIC written as, say:
(3=796)r23c12 – (6=3)r2c8 => r2c13 <> 3? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ruud
Site Owner
Joined: 30 Dec 2005
Posts: 601
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For an unordered set, you can use a vertical bar to list the members, like this:
| Code: | | (3=796)r2c2|r3c12 - (6=3)r2c8 => r2c13 <> 3 |
Ruud
_________________
“If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it, we would be so simple that we couldn't.” - Emerson M Pugh |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sudtyro
Hooked
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 49
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the quick reply! Yes, the vertical bar...I've seen that before for unordered sets...probably in SudoPedia...just didn't sink in.
Sure will be nice to get over this "beginner" stage...
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
